The UK’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme is reshaping the packaging industry, with a particular focus on glass. Dubbed the "glass tax," this new regulation shifts the full cost of recycling and waste management onto businesses that use glass packaging. While the goal is to encourage sustainability, the reality is that glass is heavy, expensive to transport, and energy-intensive to recycle. As a result, industries that rely on glass—such as food, beverage, and hospitality—are facing rising costs that may ultimately be passed on to consumers. This has led many businesses to explore alternative packaging materials that align with the EPR scheme while being more cost-effective.

One of the most promising alternatives is aluminium cans. Unlike glass, aluminium is lightweight, reducing transportation emissions and costs. It’s also highly recyclable aluminium can be melted down and reused indefinitely without degrading in quality, making it one of the most sustainable packaging materials available. In fact, aluminium cans have one of the highest recycling rates globally, with a well-established infrastructure for collection and processing. Switching from glass to cans not only helps businesses avoid the financial burden of the EPR glass tax but also improves their environmental footprint.

Beyond cost and sustainability benefits, aluminium cans offer practical advantages for both businesses and consumers. They are easier to store, less prone to breakage, and chill faster than glass bottles—making them an attractive option for beverage companies and retailers. Additionally, with consumer preferences shifting toward eco-friendly choices, brands that adopt aluminium packaging can enhance their sustainability credentials and appeal to environmentally conscious buyers. As the EPR scheme reshapes the packaging landscape, businesses that proactively transition to aluminium could position themselves ahead of the curve, reducing costs while embracing a more sustainable future.

‍